一种确保无偏失效概率估计的代理模型加速子集模拟
Accelerating subset simulation with surrogate model ensuring unbiased failure probability estimation
- 可靠性科学与工程学报（英文） 2025年第4期 页码：1-19
- 作者机构：
School of Renewable Energy, Hohai University, Changzhou, People’s Republic of China
School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
State Key Laboratory of Biobased Transportation Fuel Technology, ZJU-UIUC Institute, Zhejiang University, Haining, People’s Republic of China
- 作者简介：
[ "Yuanzhuo Ma is an associate professor at the School of Renewable Energy, Hohai University. He is engaged in research in the fields of uncertainty quantification, structural reliability, and robust design optimization, the research results of which have been applied to the reliability, robustness design, evaluation, and ensurance of large-scale wind turbines, thermal protection systems for aerospace aircraft, aviation turbine engines, multi-body systems for weapons, and electronic devices such as mobile phones. He has presided over 7 projects including the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Rapid Support Project for Equipment Development, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, and the Postdoctoral Foundation. More than 40 academic papers have been published in well-known domestic and international journal, and one Chinese academic monograph has been published in the field of structural reliability and optimization. Previously worked as a reliability engineer at Shanghai Huawei Technologies Co., LTD Youth editorial board member of JRSE, reviewer for RESS and other journals." ]
[ "Chuang Li is a postgraduate student at the School of Electrical and Power Engineering, Hohai University. He specializes in structural optimization of fluid machinery, with core research focusing on the development of novel subset simulation optimization methods and their practical application in fluid machinery structures. His research objects mainly include wind turbine blades and gear structures. He has published one SCI paper in the related research field, and remains dedicated to advancing efficient and reliable optimization methodologies for fluid machinery structural design." ]
[ "Binbin Li is a tenured associate professor (2025-) in the Zhejiang University/University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Institute (ZJUI) at the Zhejiang University, International Campus. He obtained his PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of California-Berkeley in 2016. Before joining ZJU, he worked as a research associate at the University of Liverpool from 2016–2018. Dr Li’s research focuses on developing innovative statistical methods to address safety, sustainability and resilience issues of the built civil infrastructure systems including bridges, buildings, and road/rail networks. His specific interests include Bayesian system identification, operational modal analysis, infrastructural network modeling and field test, for structure and infrastructure health management and resilience assessment." ]
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.1088/3050-2454/ae202a
中图分类号：收稿：2025-07-23，
修回：2025-10-17，
录用：2025-11-17，
网络首发：2025-12-08，
纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
Yuanzhuo Ma, Chuang Li, Binbin Li. 一种确保无偏失效概率估计的代理模型加速子集模拟[J]. 可靠性科学与工程学报（英文）, 2025,(4):1-19.
Yuanzhuo Ma, Chuang Li, Binbin Li. Accelerating subset simulation with surrogate model ensuring unbiased failure probability estimation[J]. Journal of Reliability Science and Engineering, 2025, (4): 1-19.
Yuanzhuo Ma, Chuang Li, Binbin Li. 一种确保无偏失效概率估计的代理模型加速子集模拟[J]. 可靠性科学与工程学报（英文）, 2025,(4):1-19. DOI： 10.1088/3050-2454/ae202a.
Yuanzhuo Ma, Chuang Li, Binbin Li. Accelerating subset simulation with surrogate model ensuring unbiased failure probability estimation[J]. Journal of Reliability Science and Engineering, 2025, (4): 1-19. DOI： 10.1088/3050-2454/ae202a.
摘要
代理模型可有效加速失效概率的估计过程，但当代理模型未能准确刻画真实失效面时，往往会引入估计偏差，这在高维度和/或强非线性的实际工程问题中尤为常见。借鉴马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗（MCMC）方法中的延迟接受（delayed acceptance，DA）思想，本文提出了一种将子集模拟（subset simulation，SuS）与代理模型相结合的新策略，称为 DA-SuS 方法。该方法将 MCMC 中的接受过程分解为三个阶段，其中候选样本首先由代理模型进行判别；若在该阶段被拒绝，则不再进入后续计算。该延迟接受机制不会破坏 MCMC 的详细平衡条件，即无论代理模型精度如何，其平稳分布始终保持为目标分布，从而保证了 MCMC 估计量的渐近无偏性。尽管该策略在一定程度上会降低统计效率，但由于仅对具有较高失效域概率的候选样本调用真实模型进行评估，从而显著减少了计算开销，整体计算效率得到提升。进一步地，本文引入了三种改进策略，包括 Kriging 代理模型的自适应训练、基于误判误差引导的接受准则以及链级更新方案。通过三个基准算例对 DA-SuS 算法的性能进行了验证，并与传统 SuS 及其结合代理模型的改进方法进行了对比。结果表明，所提出的 DA-SuS 方法即使在高维和强非线性问题中，仍能够实现失效概率的无偏估计，但其统计效率和计算效率在一定程度上依赖于代理模型的质量。
Abstract
Surrogate models can accelerate the failure probability estimation
but at the risk of biasedness when the surrogate does not capture the real failure surface
which is typical for real engineering problems with high dimensionality and/or high nonlinearity. Following the idea of delayed acceptance (DA) in Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)
a new strategy of combining subset simulation (SuS) and surrogate model is developed in this paper
named as DA-SuS. It decomposes the acceptance process in MCMC into three steps
in which the candidate samples are first checked by the surrogate model. If rejected by the surrogate model
the sample is no more considered. This DA does not destroy the detailed balance of MCMC
i.e.
the stationary distribution will always be the targeted one
no matter how bad the surrogate model is. Consequently
the asymptotic unbiasedness of MCMC estimator is preserved. Although the statistical efficiency deteriorates slightly
the DA brings computational savings because only those candidates with high probability in the failure domain are eventually evaluated by the true model
thus increasing the overall computational efficiency. Three improvement strategies are further introduced
including adaptive training of Kriging model
misjudgment error-guided acceptance and chain-wise updating scheme. The performance of DA-SuS algorithm is demonstrated via three benchmark examples
and compared with conventional SuS and its variants equipped with surrogate models. The proposed DA-SuS algorithm yields an unbiased estimation of the failure probability
even in the case with high dimensionality and nonlinearity
although its statistical and computational efficiency depend on the quality of the surrogate.
关键词
Keywords
references
Der Kiureghian A 2022 Structural and System Reliability ( Cambridge University Press )
Hohenbichler M and Rackwitz R 1981 Non-normal dependent vectors in structural safety J. Eng. Mech. Div. 107 1227 – 38
Liu P-L and Der Kiureghian A 1986 Multivariate distribution models with prescribed marginals and covariances Prob. Eng. Mech. 1 105 – 12
Hasofer A M and Lind M C 1974 An exact and invariant first order reliability format J. Eng. Mech. 100 111 – 21
Zhang J and Du X 2010 A second-order reliability method with first-order efficiency J. Mech. Des. 132 101006
Kroese D P and Rubinstein R Y 2012 Monte Carlo methods WIREs Comput. Stat. 4 48 – 58
Schuëller G I and Stix R 1987 A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities Struct. Saf. 4 293 – 309
Ditlevsen O , Melchers R E and Gluver H 1990 General multi-dimensional probability integration by directional simulation Comput. Struct. 36 355 – 68
Ditlevsen O , Olesen R and Mohr G 1986 Solution of a class of load combination problems by directional simulation Struct. Saf. 4 95 – 109
Nie J and Ellingwood B R 2000 Directional methods for structural reliability analysis Struct. Saf. 22 233 – 49
Schuëller G I , Pradlwarter H J and Koutsourelakis P S 2004 A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions Prob. Eng. Mech. 19 463 – 74
Pradlwarter H J , Pellissetti M F , Schenk C A , Schuëller G I , Kreis A , Fransen S , Calvi A and Klein M 2005 Realistic and efficient reliability estimation for aerospace structures Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194 1597 – 617
Au S-K and Beck J L 2001 Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation Prob. Eng. Mech. 16 263 – 77
Li H S , Ma Y Z and Cao Z 2015 A generalized subset simulation approach for estimating small failure probabilities of multiple stochastic responses Comput. Struct. 153 239 – 51
Betz W , Papaioannou I , Beck J L and Straub D 2018 Bayesian inference with subset simulation: strategies and improvements Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 331 72 – 93
Liao Z , Li B and Wan H-P 2025 From likelihood to limit state: A reliability-inspired framework for Bayesian evidence estimation and high-dimensional sampling Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 237 112969
Li H-S 2011 Subset simulation for unconstrained global optimization Appl. Math. Model. 35 5108 – 20
Li H-S and Au S-K 2010 Design optimization using subset simulation algorithm Struct. Saf. 32 384 – 92
Ma Y-Z , Li C-X , Wang Y-Y , Zhang Z-Y , Li H-S , Ding A N and Rui X-T 2024 Robust design optimization of a multi-body system with aleatory and epistemic uncertainty Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 245 110029
Ma Y-Z , Li H-S , Tee K-F and Yao W-X 2018 Combined size and shape optimization of truss structures using subset simulation optimization Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G 233 2455 – 77
Ma Y-Z , Wei J , Liu W-D , Zhi P-P , Zhao Z-Z , Xu C and Li H-S 2025 Design optimization of composite wind turbine blade using complete constrained expected improvement-subset simulation optimization Renew. Energy 249 123187
Song S , Lu Z and Qiao H 2009 Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 658 – 65
Ma Y-Z , Jin X-X , Zhao X , Li H-S , Zhao Z-Z and Xu C 2024 Reliability-oriented global sensitivity analysis using subset simulation and space partition Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 242 109794
Papaioannou I , Betz W , Zwirglmaier K and Straub D 2015 MCMC algorithms for subset simulation Prob. Eng. Mech. 41 89 – 103
Wang Z , Broccardo M and Song J 2019 Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods for subset simulation in reliability analysis Struct. Saf. 76 51 – 67
Murray I , Adams R and MacKay D 2010 Elliptical slice sampling Proc. of the Thirteenth Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics PMLR 9 541 – 8
Rashki M , Faes M G R , Wei P and Song J 2025 Asymptotic subset simulation: an efficient extrapolation tool for small probabilities approximation Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 260 111034
Li B , Xia W and Liao Z 2025 Relaxed subset simulation for reliability estimation Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 264 111302
Au S-K and Zhou X 2025 Adaptive proposal length scale in subset simulation Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 261 111069
Dang C , Valdebenito M A , Faes M G R , Wei P and Beer M 2022 Structural reliability analysis: a Bayesian perspective Struct. Saf. 99 102259
Li J 2016 Probability density evolution method: background, significance and recent developments Prob. Eng. Mech. 44 111 – 7
Chen G and Yang D 2021 A unified analysis framework of static and dynamic structural reliabilities based on direct probability integral method Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 158 107783
Bucher C G and Bourgund U 1990 A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems Struct. Saf. 7 57 – 66
Blatman G and Sudret B 2010 An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis Prob. Eng. Mech. 25 183 – 97
Meng D , Yang H , Yang S , Zhang Y , De Jesus A M , Correia J , Fazeres-Ferradosa T , Macek W , Branco R and Zhu S-P 2024 Kriging-assisted hybrid reliability design and optimization of offshore wind turbine support structure based on a portfolio allocation strategy Ocean Eng. 295 116842
Zhang Y , Song K , Liu D , Xiong C and Chou S 2023 A multi-mode failure boundary exploration and exploitation framework using adaptive Kriging model for system reliability assessment Prob. Eng. Mech. 73 103473
Wang Z , Tu Y , Zhang K , Han Z , Cao Y and Zhou D 2024 An optimization framework for wind farm layout design using CFD-based Kriging model Ocean Eng. 293 116644
Miao X , Zheng Z , Huang X , Ding P and Li S 2023 Reliability analysis and verification of penetration type fatigue crack Ocean Eng. 280 114809
Wang D , Qiu H , Gao L and Jiang C 2021 A single-loop Kriging coupled with subset simulation for time-dependent reliability analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 216 107931
Xin F , Wang P , Wang Q , Li L , Cheng L , Lei H and Ma F 2024 Parallel adaptive ensemble of metamodels combined with hypersphere sampling for rare failure events Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 246 110090
Wang Y , Xie B and Shiyuan E 2022 Adaptive relevance vector machine combined with Markov-chain-based importance sampling for reliability analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 220 108287
Xie B , Peng C and Wang Y 2023 Combined relevance vector machine technique and subset simulation importance sampling for structural reliability Appl. Math. Model. 113 129 – 43
Liu Y , Li L and Zhao S 2022 Efficient Bayesian updating with two-step adaptive Kriging Struct. Saf. 95 102172
BahooToroody A , Abaei M M , Banda O V , Montewka J and Kujala P 2022 On reliability assessment of ship machinery system in different autonomy degree; a Bayesian-based approach Ocean Eng. 254 111252
Li H , Soares C G and Huang H-Z 2020 Reliability analysis of a floating offshore wind turbine using Bayesian networks Ocean Eng. 217 107827
Zhang L , Fan Q , Lin J , Zhang Z , Yan X and Li C 2023 A nearly end-to-end deep learning approach to fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearboxes under nonstationary conditions Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 119 105735
Echard B , Gayton N and Lemaire M 2011 AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation Struct. Saf. 33 145 – 54
Yun W , Lu Z , Wang L , Feng K , He P and Dai Y 2021 Error-based stopping criterion for the combined adaptive Kriging and importance sampling method for reliability analysis Prob. Eng. Mech. 65 103131
Cao R , Sun Z , Wang J and Guo F 2022 A single-loop reliability analysis strategy for time-dependent problems with small failure probability Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 219 108230
Zuniga M M , Murangira A and Perdrizet T 2021 Structural reliability assessment through surrogate based importance sampling with dimension reduction Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 207 107289
Zhang X , Lu Z and Cheng K 2021 AK-DS: an adaptive Kriging-based directional sampling method for reliability analysis Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 156 107610
Song J , Wei P , Valdebenito M and Beer M 2021 Active learning line sampling for rare event analysis Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 147 107113
Zhang Y , Dong Y and Xu J 2023 An accelerated active learning Kriging model with the distance-based subdomain and a new stopping criterion for reliability analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 231 109034
Yu S , Wang Z and Li Y 2022 Time and space-variant system reliability analysis through adaptive Kriging and weighted sampling Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 166 108443
Zhao Z , Lu Z-H , Zhang X-Y and Zhao Y-G 2022 A nested single-loop Kriging model coupled with subset simulation for time-dependent system reliability analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 228 108819
Guo H , Dong Y and Gardoni P 2023 Adaptive subset simulation for time-dependent small failure probability incorporating first failure time and single-loop surrogate model Struct. Saf. 102 102327
Chen J , Chen Z , Xu Y and Li H 2021 Efficient reliability analysis combining kriging and subset simulation with two-stage convergence criterion Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 214 107737
Guo H , Dong Y and Gardoni P 2022 Efficient subset simulation for rare-event integrating point-evolution kernel density and adaptive polynomial chaos kriging Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 169 108762
Dhulipala S L N , Shields M D , Chakroborty P , Jiang W , Spencer B W , Hales J D , Labouré V M , Prince Z M , Bolisetti C and Che Y 2022 Reliability estimation of an advanced nuclear fuel using coupled active learning, multifidelity modeling, and subset simulation Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 226 108693
Bichon B J , Eldred M S , Swiler L P , Mahadevan S and McFarland J M 2008 Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions AIAA J. 46 2459 – 68
Lv Z , Lu Z and Wang P 2015 A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering Comput. Math. Appl. 70 1182 – 97
Sun Z , Wang J , Li R and Tong C 2017 LIF: a new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 157 152 – 65
Chen Z , Li G , He J , Yang Z and Wang J 2022 Adaptive structural reliability analysis method based on confidence interval squeezing Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 225 108639
Yang S , Jo H , Lee K and Lee I 2022 Expected system improvement (ESI): a new learning function for system reliability analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 222 108449
Ma Y-Z , Zhu Y-C , Li H-S , Nan H , Zhao Z-Z and Jin X-X 2022 Adaptive Kriging-based failure probability estimation for multiple responses Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 228 108771
Ma Y-Z , Li C , Li C-X , Xu B-F , Ding A N , Li H-S and Zhao Z-Z 2025 Reliability assessment of offshore wind turbine gears under multiple failure modes using deeply coupled adaptive Kriging based-generalized subset simulation Ocean Eng. 336 121868
Christen J A , Fox C J J O C and Statistics G 2005 Markov chain Monte Carlo using an approximation J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 14 795 – 810
Peskun P H J B 1973 Optimum Monte-Carlo sampling using Markov chains Biometrika 60 607 – 12
Wang Z and Shafieezadeh A 2019 ESC: an efficient error-based stopping criterion for kriging-based reliability analysis methods Struct. Multidiscip. Opt. 59 1621 – 37
Teerapabolarn K and Neammanee K 2005 A non-uniform bound on Poisson approximation in somatic cell hybrid model Math. Biosci. 195 56 – 64
- 网络PDF下载
- Meta-XML下载
- BibTeX下载
- Endnote下载
- RefMan 下载
- NoteExpress下载
- NoteFirst下载
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
- 技术支持由北京北大方正电子有限公司提供 京ICP备09064830号-19
京公网安备11010802024621 - 本系统建议在Chrome、 IE9+ 以上版本浏览器阅读本站内容，360浏览器请切换至极速模式
- Cookies帮助我们提供服务并提供个性化体验。使用本网站，即表示您同意我们使用Cookies